By James Carter
Elon Musk’s influence is once again shaping public opinion—but this time, it’s not about Tesla stock or SpaceX launches. In Nashville, it’s about tunnels. And according to a new survey, Musk’s name alone may be the biggest hurdle for his own infrastructure project.
A recent Vanderbilt University survey revealed a striking shift in sentiment among Nashville residents. When asked about a proposed underground tunnel system connecting downtown Nashville to the airport, 35% of respondents said they opposed the plan. However, when the same proposal explicitly mentioned Elon Musk and his Boring Company, opposition jumped sharply to 51%.
That 16 percentage point increase highlights a growing reality: Musk’s personal brand is now directly influencing how the public evaluates his business ventures.
What Is the Music City Loop Project
The project, known as the Music City Loop, is being developed by Musk’s Boring Company. It aims to build underground tunnels beneath Nashville that would transport passengers in Tesla vehicles between downtown and Nashville International Airport.
The proposed system is designed to cut travel time to around 8 to 10 minutes, significantly faster than current road travel. The company plans to construct up to 20 miles of tunnels, with an estimated cost ranging between $200 million and $300 million. Importantly, the project is expected to be privately funded, meaning it would not rely on taxpayer money.
Supporters say the loop could remove thousands of vehicles from surface roads daily, easing congestion in one of America’s fastest-growing cities.
Why Opposition Is Rising
While the idea of faster airport transit sounds appealing, the resistance is being driven by more than just logistics.
The Vanderbilt researchers noted that public opinion is “heavily influenced by partisanship.” Musk’s increasing involvement in politics has made him a deeply polarizing figure. He reportedly spent nearly $300 million supporting Donald Trump’s return to the White House and later led a controversial government initiative focused on cutting federal spending.
That initiative, known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), was linked to major workforce reductions—reportedly eliminating around 300,000 federal jobs—and cutting funding across several agencies. It also scaled back foreign aid programs significantly before being dissolved.
Even though Musk has since stepped away from direct political roles, those actions continue to shape public perception.
Local Government vs State Power
The political divide is also visible at the local level. Nashville’s Metro City Council has formally opposed the tunnel project, citing concerns about safety, environmental impact, and the company’s track record.
However, state-level leadership in Tennessee has taken a different approach. Republican officials have granted permission for the Boring Company to move forward with tunneling beneath state highways, effectively allowing the project to continue despite local resistance.
There is also an ongoing legislative discussion that could give the state more authority over such infrastructure projects, including control over funding and regulation. If passed, this could limit the city’s ability to intervene in safety or operational decisions.
Safety and Track Record Concerns
Critics are not just reacting to Musk’s politics—they are also questioning the Boring Company’s history.
Past projects, particularly the Las Vegas Loop, have faced scrutiny over safety violations, missed inspections, and workplace issues. According to public reports, regulators have raised concerns about construction practices, environmental compliance, and worker safety.
Earlier this month, Nevada officials even called for a more comprehensive safety plan addressing risks tied to tunneling operations.
These issues have fueled skepticism in Nashville, where residents and city leaders want stronger assurances before embracing a large-scale underground transit system.
Despite Opposition, Project Moves Forward
Even with rising resistance, the Music City Loop is steadily advancing.
Recent developments include key approvals from the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. In addition, Nashville’s Convention Center Authority granted the Boring Company access to an easement that allows tunneling beneath the Music City Center—an important step toward connecting downtown with the airport.
Construction activity is expected to ramp up, with early phases potentially operational by late 2026. The full system could be completed by 2029.
The project is being positioned as one of the largest privately funded infrastructure efforts in the U.S., signaling Musk’s continued push into urban transportation.
Expansion Plans Beyond Nashville
Nashville is just one piece of a larger strategy.
The Boring Company has already announced that it is studying similar tunnel projects in cities like New Orleans, Baltimore, and Dallas. The company is even promoting a “Tunnel Vision Challenge,” offering a free one-mile tunnel to selected locations as a way to expand its footprint.
However, the reaction in Nashville could serve as a warning. Public perception—especially when tied to Musk—may become a critical factor in whether these projects gain traction elsewhere.
A Project Defined by More Than Engineering
At its core, the Nashville tunnel debate is no longer just about infrastructure. It is about trust, politics, and perception.
Supporters argue the project could transform transportation, reduce congestion, and create jobs without costing taxpayers. Critics counter that safety risks, lack of local control, and Musk’s controversial image outweigh the potential benefits.
As highlighted in a CNBC report, opposition has been building steadily, especially as more details about the project and the company’s history come into focus.
Ultimately, the biggest takeaway may be this: Elon Musk is no longer just a business leader influencing markets—he is a figure who can directly shift public opinion on major infrastructure projects.
In Nashville, that influence is proving to be both powerful and problematic at the same time.














