MASHHAD, Iran â A Sepehran Airlines Boeing 737 flying from Mashhad to Kermanshah made an emergency return to Mashhad after a technical problem developed during departure, with passenger footage showing violent cabin vibration and overhead panels coming loose.
đ¨đ¨ ŮŮŘŻŮ٠٠٠اŮءا،ع؊..
â اŮŘŁŘدا؍ اŮؚاŮŮ ŮŘŠ (@NewsNow4world1) September 15, 2026
ا؜ءعت ءا،ع؊ بŮŮŮŘş 737 تابؚ؊ ŮŘ´ŘąŮŘŠ ءŮعا٠سبŮعا٠اŮŘĽŮعاŮŮŘŠ ŮŮŘšŮŘŻŘŠ ŘĽŮ٠٠ءاع Ů Ř´ŮŘŻ بؚد اŮŮ؏اع ŘŁŘŘŻ ؼءاعاتŮا ŘšŮب اŮŘĽŮŮاؚ بŮŮŘŞ ŮŘľŮŘąŘ Ů Ů Ř§ ŘŁŘŻŮ ŘĽŮŮ ŘŞŮŮ Ů ŘŘąŮŮا. pic.twitter.com/3zpH90bXH1
The aircraft landed safely at Mashhad’s Shahid Hasheminejad International Airport, and Iranian reports said passengers were unharmed. Early accounts pointed to a tire-related problem during takeoff followed by a reported engine emergency, although the exact mechanical sequence has not yet been publicly established.
Sepehran Boeing 737 turns back after takeoff
The Boeing 737 was operating a domestic flight from Mashhad in northeastern Iran to Kermanshah in western Iran when the problem emerged.
Initial Iranian media reports described a tire burst during takeoff. Later information attributed to Hassan Jafari, public relations director for airports in Razavi Khorasan province, provided a more specific account, saying material from the tread of a tire separated during departure rather than confirming that the entire tire exploded.
After becoming airborne, the pilot reported an engine-related emergency and requested a return to Mashhad. Some early reports also referred to possible engine damage, but the extent and cause of any damage have not been officially established.
The flight crew brought the aircraft safely back to Mashhad, where passengers were able to leave the plane.
Video shows cabin shaking violently
Passenger footage captured the most dramatic moments of the emergency. The video shows intense vibration inside the Boeing 737 as sections of the overhead ceiling and interior trim move or become displaced.
The images led to claims on social media that the aircraft was “falling apart” in the air. Available evidence does not establish that.
Cabin ceiling panels and trim are not the aircraft’s primary load-bearing structure. The footage therefore shows a serious cabin disturbance but cannot, on its own, prove structural failure.
Tire and reported engine problem are key questions
Early reporting from Mehr News Agency linked the emergency to a tire-related event during takeoff and reports of an engine problem.
Investigators will need to determine what separated from the wheel or tire, whether debris struck another part of the aircraft, what prompted the engine-related emergency and whether those events caused the severe vibration experienced by passengers.
Until technical findings are released, it would be premature to describe the incident as a confirmed engine failure or structural breakup.
Mount Etna Eruption Disrupts Catania Airport as Flights Are Suspended
UK Airport Chaos: 177 Flights Cancelled as Travel Disruption Deepens
Runway 31L temporarily closed at Mashhad
The emergency also affected airport operations. Initial reports said Runway 31L was temporarily closed after the aircraft returned.
A runway can be closed after this type of incident so airport teams can recover the aircraft and inspect the surface for debris or damage. Later reports indicated that operations returned to normal and both runways were available again.
Passengers originally traveling to Kermanshah were reportedly transferred to another aircraft to continue their journey.
Aircraft involved identified as Boeing 737-300
Aviation tracking information associated the incident with a Sepehran Airlines Boeing 737 carrying Iranian registration EP-FSU, identified in aviation databases as a 737-300-series aircraft.
The aircraft’s model or age alone does not explain the emergency. Investigators would need to examine the specific tire and wheel assembly, landing gear, engines and other affected systems before determining a cause.
Passengers safe as investigation turns to cause
No fatalities or serious passenger injuries were reported in the available information following the landing. That safe outcome is significant given the severity of the vibration visible inside the cabin.
The emergency is another reminder of why pilots may return immediately when a potentially serious mechanical problem develops after departure. A recent Qantas flight returned after a suspected engine problem, while separate Sydney Airport flight delays demonstrated how aviation problems can quickly affect travelers and airport operations.
For the Sepehran flight, several questions remain unanswered: what caused the tire-tread separation, whether debris contributed to the reported engine problem, and what produced the violent cabin vibration.
Until investigators provide those answers, the dramatic footage should be reported with context. What is established is that the Boeing 737 encountered a serious problem after leaving Mashhad, the crew turned back, and the aircraft landed safely with its passengers.














