Global oil markets are entering unfamiliar territory — production is rising, inventories are swelling, and demand growth is softening. The International Energy Agency (IEA) now warns that Brent crude could test the $60 mark by early 2026 if current trends persist. Here’s what’s driving the imbalance — and who stands to gain or lose.
The supply–demand mismatch
According to the IEA Oil Market Report (Oct 2025), global crude supply is outpacing consumption by roughly 0.7 million barrels per day (mb/d). Inventories are climbing for a fifth consecutive quarter — something not seen since 2015.
OPEC+’s gradual unwinding of production cuts, surging U.S. shale output, and new capacity from Brazil, Canada and Guyana have created a glut just as China’s and Europe’s demand cools. Brent prices briefly rallied above $85 in mid-2025 but have since slipped toward $70.
Where the extra oil is coming from
- OPEC+ unwinds cuts: A 547 kb/d hike announced for Q4 2025 adds barrels to an already saturated market.
- Non-OPEC growth: U.S., Brazil, Canada, and Guyana together add over 1 mb/d of new supply.
- Iran & Venezuela: Sanction relief and gray-market exports re-enter official statistics.
The IEA projects total supply growth of 1.6 mb/d in 2025 versus just 0.9 mb/d demand growth — a clear imbalance that could persist into 2026.
Demand cools as economies slow
While aviation and petrochemicals provide some support, road-fuel demand in Europe and China has plateaued. Electric-vehicle penetration surpassed 20 % in 2025 in advanced markets, curbing gasoline consumption. The IEA’s World Energy Outlook 2025 forecasts global oil demand to average 104.3 mb/d in 2025 and flatten by 2026.
Weak manufacturing sentiment, high interest rates and mild winters have trimmed energy use across OECD economies.
Brent forecast: Sub-$60 possible?
Analysts at Reuters and Bloomberg expect Brent to average $70–$72 in early 2026. However, if inventories rise beyond 300 million barrels above the five-year average, algorithmic selling and fund outflows could push prices below $60 for the first time since 2020.
Futures curves already show deepening contango — a sign that traders anticipate oversupply.
Top Crude-Oil Exporters & Importers (2025 Snapshot)
Compiled from Energy Institute Statistical Review 2024 and OPEC ASB 2024 trade tables with IEA updates (Oct 2025). Volumes in million barrels per day (mb/d).
| Top Exporters | Top Importers | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Country | Exports | Rank | Country | Imports |
| 1 | Saudi Arabia | 7.4 ↑ | 1 | China | 10.8 ↓ |
| 2 | Russia | 6.6 → | 2 | India | 5.4 ↑ |
| 3 | Iraq | 4.0 ↑ | 3 | United States (select grades) | 5.1 → |
| 4 | Canada | 3.9 ↑ | 4 | Japan | 2.5 ↓ |
| 5 | UAE | 3.7 ↑ | 5 | South Korea | 2.4 ↓ |
| 6 | United States | 3.6 ↑ | 6 | Germany | 2.0 → |
| 7 | Kuwait | 2.4 → | 7 | Netherlands | 1.9 → |
| 8 | Nigeria | 1.5 ↓ | 8 | Spain | 1.3 → |
| 9 | Norway | 1.4 → | 9 | Italy | 1.1 → |
| 10 | Kazakhstan | 1.3 → | 10 | France | 1.0 → |
↑ = rising trend • ↓ = declining • → = stable (2025 projection)
Winners & losers of a $60 oil world
- Importing nations such as India, Japan and Europe benefit from lower energy inflation and trade deficits.
- Exporters including Saudi Arabia and Russia face budget strain and pressure to diversify revenues.
- Investors see mixed effects — airlines and shipping gain, while oil majors cut capex plans.
Supply Picture — What’s Opening Up, Where Are the Barrels Coming From
The 2026 oil outlook is dominated by a simple equation: new barrels are arriving faster than demand can absorb them. Below is a clear mapping of where incremental supply is likely to come from and why it matters for Brent pricing.
1) Non-OPEC Growth: Offshore “new wave” + US Shale Discipline
A significant tranche of 2025–2027 supply is set to originate outside OPEC. Three hotspots stand out:
- U.S. Shale — Productivity gains, refracs, and selective drilling keep output resilient even under tighter capital discipline.
- Brazil (pre-salt) — Large, low-lifting-cost fields ramping up; FPSO deployments add step-changes in capacity.
- Guyana (offshore) — Multi-phase developments pushing stable growth; high-quality crude supports refinery yields.
Net effect: a steady stream of light-sweet barrels that are attractive to global refiners, especially when margins for middle distillates soften.
2) OPEC+ Strategy: Balancing Cuts vs. Market Share
OPEC+ remains the pivotal swing factor. The decision set is binary:
- Extend or deepen cuts to defend price > reduces near-term supply, supports Brent.
- Ease cuts / defend share > increases availability, pressures Brent if demand underperforms.
In practice, the group’s spare capacity provides a ceiling on price spikes: if Brent jumps, more barrels can re-enter and cool the rally.
3) Inventories & Floating Storage: The Slow-Moving Signal
When supply outruns consumption, onshore inventories build, starting in hubs (U.S., Europe, Asia) and then spilling into floating storage if tank capacity tightens. Rising stocks steepen contango and weigh on spot prices, a classic sign of oversupply.
4) Project Pipeline (2025–2027): Where New Capacity Is Concentrated
- Deepwater/Ultradeepwater: FPSO tie-ins and phased ramp-ups (South America, West Africa) add multi-year flows.
- Middle East: Brownfield debottlenecking + incremental capacity keeps spare capacity comfortably high.
- Russia/Caspian: Logistics and policy risk can modulate realized exports, but baseline volumes remain material.
- North Sea: Mature decline moderated by targeted infill and small project startups; net contribution is modest vs. offshore peers.
| Region / Source | Primary Driver | What to Watch |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Shale | Productivity + selective drilling | Rig counts, DUCs, well productivity, cash discipline |
| Brazil (pre-salt) | FPSO ramp-ups, low lifting costs | FPSO delivery/maintenance, realized uptime |
| Guyana (offshore) | Multi-phase field expansion | Phase start dates, plateau targets, export logistics |
| OPEC+ Core | Policy on quotas & spare capacity | Meeting outcomes, compliance, spare capacity estimates |
| Inventories / Storage | Onshore builds → floating storage | Weekly stock data, tanker tracking, time-spreads (contango) |
5) Logistics & Pricing Dynamics
Freight rates, arbitrage windows, and refinery maintenance cycles all shape how quickly new barrels find a home. When freight costs drop and differentials widen, more light-sweet barrels clear into Atlantic Basin refiners, easing any localized tightness and keeping benchmark prices under pressure.
Historical Comparison — Lessons from Past Oil Gluts
Oil markets have faced supply gluts and demand shocks before. Looking back at prior episodes helps frame what might happen if oversupply persists into 2026. Below is a concise, scannable comparison of 1980s glut, 2014–2016 shale surge, 2020 pandemic collapse, and the 2025–2026 setup—with the practical lessons that matter for Brent pricing.
A Quick Timeline of Major Glut Episodes
- 1980s Oil Glut: Non-OPEC supply grew, demand slowed after the 1970s shocks; OPEC defended price, then ceded market share.
- 2014–2016 Shale Wave: US shale productivity surged; OPEC initially held output → price collapse; later, coordinated cuts stabilized market.
- 2020 Pandemic Shock: Demand cratered; storage maxed out; extreme time-spread contango; policy and demand recovery normalized balances.
- 2025–2026 Setup: Non-OPEC offshore + resilient shale add barrels; demand growth moderates; OPEC+ policy remains the swing variable.
| Episode | Primary Drivers | Market Mechanics | Outcome & Lesson |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s Glut | Non-OPEC growth, demand slowdown, OPEC price defense | Rising inventories, market share battle | Lesson: Prolonged defense of price can deepen losses; share-first strategy eventually prevailed. |
| 2014–2016 Shale | US shale productivity shock, OPEC initially holds output | Steep contango, capex cuts, consolidation | Lesson: Low-cost barrels survive; coordinated cuts later restore balance. |
| 2020 Pandemic | Demand collapse, storage saturation | Extreme spreads, logistics bottlenecks, rapid policy response | Lesson: Exogenous demand shocks can overwhelm supply management; storage is the pressure valve. |
| 2025–2026 Setup | Offshore ramp-ups (Brazil/Guyana), resilient shale, moderated demand growth | Inventory builds, spare capacity as ceiling, OPEC+ policy optionality | Working view: Without persistent cuts or a demand surprise, Brent remains pressured; sub-$60 risk rises. |
The “Glut Playbook” — Patterns That Repeat
- Inventories lead price: Builds steepen contango and weigh on spot Brent.
- Spare capacity caps rallies: High spare capacity = swift supply response to price spikes.
- Low-cost advantage: Lowest lifting-cost producers keep pumping; higher-cost supply retrenches.
- Policy as pivot: Durable price floors typically require credible, sustained cuts or a demand surprise.
- Capex elasticity: Investment falls fast in busts, seeding the next upcycle—but with lags.
Glut Indicators to Watch (Now vs. Past)
- Time-spreads: Widening contango often signals persistent surplus.
- Onshore vs. floating storage: Shift to floating suggests tanks are tightening onshore.
- Freight rates & differentials: Cheaper freight + wider differentials help surplus barrels clear.
- OPEC+ compliance/communication: Cohesive, transparent policy shortens gluts; ambiguity extends them.
- Non-OPEC project cadence: FPSO start-ups and uptime in Brazil/Guyana; US shale productivity and DUC trends.
Myths vs Facts from Prior Gluts
- Myth: “Any OPEC cut instantly lifts prices.”
Fact: Cuts work best when inventories are already trending down and demand is firming. - Myth: “All producers suffer equally.”
Fact: Cost curves matter—low-cost producers gain share; high-cost projects pause or exit. - Myth: “Demand always bounces back quickly.”
Fact: Structural shifts (efficiency, EVs) can flatten rebounds even after cyclical slumps.
Quick FAQs — Reader Questions We Often Get
Does today look more like 2014–2016 or 1980s?
Closer to 2014–2016: technology-driven supply growth plus a coordinated policy lever (OPEC+)—but with more structural demand headwinds today.
Could a single large cut fix prices quickly?
It helps, but durability matters. Cuts need to be credible, sustained, and paired with declining inventories to set a lasting floor.
What would negate the sub-$60 Brent case?
Material supply disruptions, surprising demand strength (e.g., China/India), or a policy path that draws down stocks faster than expected.
How to Use These Lessons in 2026
- Track inventory trends weekly/monthly; price follows stocks with a lag.
- Watch OPEC+ signaling around extensions vs easing of cuts.
- Monitor project milestones (FPSO start-ups, maintenance) and US shale productivity.
- Read time-spreads: persistent contango typically confirms surplus conditions.
What to Watch (Quick Checklist)
- Monthly OPEC+ meetings — signal on quotas and compliance.
- US weekly data — production trends, stock changes, crude/time-spreads.
- FPSO milestones — Brazil/Guyana unit start-ups, maintenance, and uptime.
- Floating storage — persistent increase usually confirms oversupply.
- Freight & differentials — widening light-sweet discounts = easier clearing.
Long-term outlook: structural oversupply?
As renewables and EV adoption accelerate, the IEA expects oil demand to plateau before 2030. OPEC’s strategy to defend market share by keeping output high could keep prices range-bound well into the next decade.
Official Sources
🌍 Curious about how technology waste connects to global trade? Explore our latest infographic — E-Waste Map 2025: Where the World’s Tech Ends Up .
